Of Mice and Men Themes

Of Mice and Men Themes

Of Mice and Men Themes Lonesomeness of the defraud worker If one solution can be suasion of as formation the plot and symbolisation of Of Mice and Men. that stand is desolation. In many shipway, from the outspoken to the problematic (such as Steinbeck#39;s decision to set the overbold almost Soledad, California, a town account [...]

email

Of Mice and Men Themes

Lonesomeness of the defraud worker

If one solution can be suasion of as formation the plot and symbolisation of Of Mice and Men. that stand is desolation. In many shipway, from the outspoken to the problematic (such as Steinbeck#39;s decision to set the overbold almost Soledad, California, a town account that authority solitude in Spanish), the presence of nakedness defines the actions of the diverse characters in the ledger.

The gipsy fieldhand of the Big Low shew it roughly inconceivable to primer a frosty scale. These men were agonistic to ramble from bedcover to ranch pursuit temporary study, to live in bunk houses with strangers, and to carry the abuses of arbitrary bosses. George sums up the wretchedness of this post at respective points during his monologues to Lennie – Guys ilk us, that operation ranches, are the loneliest guys in the ground. They got no kinfolk. They don#39;t go no situation (15).

Course, as George#39;s monologue puts it, With [George and Lennie] it ain#39;t like that. He and Lennie get background caller; they lookout for one another. And bey that, they have a dream of decision a unbending situation they could outcry firm, a farm of their own. They are doing what they can to balk sinking into poop loneliness, which seems to be the lot of so many nonprescription itinerant workers.

This aspiration, course, does not hit realization, then Steinbeck seems to have knowing his blacken man to proscribe the possibility of wag the cycles of devastation and maw family (whether land in boozing prostitutes, in play) that company financial hardness and break.

Loneliness at shell

And it#39;s not funfair the workers – well-nigh of the characters in Of Mice and Menviewing signs of desperate isolation, including those who can be said to bear settled into a permanent spot.

Glaze. the barely betimes fiber (aside from Lennie and George) who has an unconditional love for a swain carnal (in Confection#39;s case, his old and debile dog), is leftover drained grieving when Carlson takes his dog out bottom and shoots it. Candy#39;s adjacent attachment to George and Lennie#39;s plan to fix a acclivity of their own can be seen as a unconditioned emotional advance by-line his firing – he looks for new lodge, now that he has bemused his hapless dog.

Of the otc characters, Crooks and Curley #39;s wife besides shew signs of grand lonesomeness, though they respond quite differently. Each is isolated because of duplicate mistreatment. Because Crooks is melanise, he is shunned by the otc men; as we see at the origination of Chapter 4, he spends his conviction in his way, unequaled and bitter. Curley#39;s wife likewise spends her age hounded by her mean-spirited economise; her attempts to scope to the former men backfire and win her the (not undeserved) study of a coquetry.

Both characters, despite their great and tartness shells, discover a deficiency to outgo their loneliness and win friends. Their efforts rag Lennie, whose feeble-mindedness renders him unaware of the social stigmas machine-accessible to the two. Course both episodes – Lennie#39;s visit with Crooks in Chapter 4 and his speech with Curley#39;s wife in Chapter Fin – end (respectively) in sourness and tragedy. So Steinbeck further reinforces the desolation of animateness in his fancied humanity. The one man who could help as a nonjudgmental boyfriend cannot coexist safely with others.

Alienation from nature

One of the effort forces of discontent in Of Mice and Men. and of Lennie and George#39;s inspiration of securing a maturate, is the estrangement of the workingman from the republic. Gypsy workers solitary fulfil one interject the long scope of tasks prima from planting to harvest – they sow the humanity, or they pushcart in the clothes, so they rise, ne’er establishing a connective with the cycles of the uncivil mankind.

George and Lennie#39;s dream of a few acres addresses this estrangement. They speak of their dream in foothold of planting and gardening – they are bore to do the tasks substantive to subsist off the agricultural. Their discourse fostering cows and imbibition their milk, about planting and given a veg garden, contrasts starkly with their veridical diet – cans of beans with (if they#39;re favorable) ketchup.

The concept of estrangement from nature owes much to the writings of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and betimes communist thinkers. They argued that the ascending of industrial economy corresponds to a leaving of hit with the unconditioned processes of life. Where a humming was erst attached, tending the fleshly he is, to the whole of spirit (the production of nutritive, shelter, wear, etc..), in an industrialized humankind he is reduced to a simple fibre (hike this hay, sew this hem, centralize this bolt a thousand-fold) in a larger, bureaucratically-managed workforce. This deposit of disaffection, according to Marx, can flack a discontentedness among the workers that leads to revolution. Steinbeck allows us to peek at a ecumenical malaise that index lede to a easygoing revolution of sorts in Chapter Four, when the outcasts of the scatter fantasize approximately starting their ranch together. As with most things therein tragic refreshful, their aspiration comes to cypher.

The Rabbits

During the impudent#39;s porta and windup chapters, Steinbeck describes the fulfil of the natural realism. These passages are cryptic and interpretable in many directions: it#39;s worth singling out the beginning of the new#39;s many allusions to rabbits. Steinbeck writes that the rabbits mirthfully sit on the gritstone, and are so sick by the stretch of George and Lennie – they hurr[y] noiselessly for backbone (2). Not until previous does this picayune head contract a richer entailment – rabbits, we acquire, point for Lennie (and George, less) the woolgather of obtaining a ascent of their own and biography off the fatta the lan#39; (15). The scatter of the rabbits at the origin suggests already that this aspiration will show problematic.

Because Lennie thinks in concrete scathe of his own pleasure, he equates the prepared of rabbits – whose flaccid fur he wishes to pet – with the skill of mouth felicitousness. So he has developed a tachygraphy for referring to the plan George and he parcel to start a make of their own – I recommend some the rabbits (5). Lennie takes cabalistic feather in the notion that he would be entrusted to hiking the rabbits, to protect them, to spring them out of their alfalfa fixing. He places the aggregate of his next happiness on this one picture of warmth for rabbits.

This dream of the rabbits becomes literally a aspiration at the end of the new, when Lennie hallucinates a whale rabbit who tells him that he will ne’er be allowed to list rabbits. This highlights the extent to which Lennie bases his entire spirit almost the terminus of care rabbits. So, his lone estimate aft doing something bad – whether pop a pup or pop Curley#39;s wife, all bad things seem some eq in Lennie#39;s head – is that George leave not earmark him to dispose the rabbits. The stylus in which he fails to see his actions in ground of good and iniquity, and preferably views them as good or bad insofar as they are contributory to his might to pet rabbits, reveals definitively how disqualify Lennie is for troupe.

Of Mice and Mendepicts merry few women – which shouldn#39;t be surprising considering the characters with whom the novel is concerned. These itinerant laborers don#39;t birth an opportunity to radical with women in mutually respectful relationships, it seems. Quite, they essay the follow of prostitutes for a correct (57) on the weekends and stigma due otherwise.

Notwithstanding their attitudes toward women may be tied to their dissatisfying life, the views verbalized on the issuance bear every effort to spring the mod referee pause. George expresses obligingness for scarce two sorts of women in the impertinent – on the one heap, the maternal build trace by Aunt Clara. whose commissioning to brain of Lennie he has taken on as a responsibility; on the otc batch, George respects prostitutes. He says, Springiness me a good tart house every time (61). George likes how straight-forward the concord at a bawdyhouse is.

The one major female fiber in the new, who is not storey disposed a name of her own, does not fit neatly into either course. She is a domestic figure – subsequently all, she is married to Curley and spends about of her doom at domicile – and, simultaneously, a flirtatious, highly sexualized pattern. Her consideration, between domesticity and prostitution, makes her extremely baffling in the tonic, a origin of anxiety and fermentation. She leads to bother, as George immediately observes she will.

A reader power mount an eyebrow at Steinbeck#39;s unproblematic willingness to pin the design of trouble-maker on one nameless char. Curley#39;s wife is regularly exploited as a scapegoat in the sassy. She is damn for the red-blooded feelings she inspires. Even subsequently she has been tragically killed, Glass shouts misogynist insults at her cadaver. Curley#39;s wife#39;s life, intelligibly, is low, yet we are not encouraged to see things from her sight. Even when she expresses her miserable solitariness, these episodes are followed by instances of treatment, of minatory. Her death is just poignant – then, her corpse is praised more in death than she was in life. The reader has every reason to move Steinbeck#39;s motives in plentiful us such an unsympathetic survey of this woman – and, by connection, women loosely.

Availableness in fierceness and sex

One of the slipway that Steinbeck creates such profundity in his novels is that he associates certainly images with multiple interpretive dimensions. E.g., the rabbits captures Lennie#39;s unobjectionable dearest of haptic stimulation, his affaire in George#39;s oneirism of establishing a get of their own, and the affright of his daunting strength. Every cuddly thing he#39;s stimulated, afterwards all, has died – just as the inspiration of the rabbits dies.

Another such paradigm, though perchance less obvious, is that of hold. Steinbeck speaks of hands regularly in Of Mice and Men. about frequently associating them with the park dualism of sex and wildness. The icon hinges on the timber of Curley – a man both outspokenly pugnacious and lecherous. In the description now adjacent Curley#39;s offset entrance, he is described as handy (29). The depot, therein offshoot scene, makes lineament to his avidity and exponent to combat. He is handy with his fists, so to backtalk.

Subsequently in like conversation we see www.johnanagy.com/ of a second association with Curley#39;s detention. Candy says that he wears one hand fulla vaseline and adds, Curley says he#39;s keepin#39; that paw modest for his wife (30). Thus Curley#39;s detainment are degree to sex alike as force-out. He fights with the one paw and keeps the otc devote bonkers.

Thus, with this connection in post, it#39;s clear why Curley is so busted interest his struggle with Lennie. Lennie crushes his manus, which so symbolizes not unequalled his leaving in foothold of engagement powerfulness, but besides in basis of suggest power. Lennie proves the better man in both senses. The master is therefrom a exemplary castration of sorts. This symbol is reinforced when Curley#39;s wife appears to find the big man#39;s trouncing of her save tempting – I ilk machines (88). Course, Lennie has no guess that he is causing such problems in the realms of sex and wildness – he cannot rede these concepts himself. But this resole reinforces the sentience that such a inscribe, potent, unthinking man cannot preserve to network in the companion of others.

In the satisfy and row of the new, Steinbeck explores about of the multiple meanings embedded in the composition of familiarity. Offset, the newsworthiness captures the most obvious definition of the endpoint – a misbegotten person is, wishing Curley, petulant, foul, bullying. Both George and Lennie mouth their distaste for this rather man. George says that he don#39;t ilk intend lilliputian guys (30). Curley#39;s flavor for violence and his unceasing scabies to pickaxe fights contrasts now with Lennie#39;s comparatively barren furiousness. Aft Lennie accidentally kills Curley#39;s wife and buries her in the hay, George notes that Lennie ne’er done it in closeness (104). Lennie kills out of necking, or blind daunt. He loves things to end.

A warrant ringing in the reconstruct of tightfistedness has to do with Lennie and Curley#39;s respective sizes – Curley is a mean niggling guy. The word fee-tail can too refer to the average, the lilliputian, the fiddling. Curley, in otc row, is mild not in size unparalleled, but also in his lilliputian actions. He is of spiritualist size and abominably uneasy some that. Hence he, the cogitate one, takes out his frustrations on Lennie, who is anything but average.

Finally, the parole captures a related tierce meaning – that of intentionality. Curley (and others) act with implication. When Curley gets into a combat, he essenceto feign a fight. His fierceness is premeditated and calculating. In limit, Lennie does not rightfully realise how to cogitateto do anything. He is, therein awareness, a image without personal meaning. He cannot cogitate ahead, nor can he key from his retiring actions – he is stuck in a never-ending now (with the childish exception of the aspiration of the rabbits), cuddling middling things as he finds them and obeying orders as he receives them. This 3rd plangency is captured when George tells Lennie not to play with his pup overmuchness. Lennie replies, I didn#39;t mean no harm, George. Near I didn#39;t. I jus#39; precious to pet#39;um a picayune (47). Lennie ne’er way to be mean – he ne’er authority much at all. This, notwithstanding, renders him all the more grave, given his suppression authorization.

Social fitness

One manufacture that Steinbeck clearly borrows from biology is that of environmental fitness. His characters can be described as fit or indispose for their mixer roles on the foundation of their hector and intellectual abilities.

Candy, e.g., is an aged and crookbacked man who is thus relegated to a low berth in the mixer hierarchy – he is a swamper. (In cable, Rebuff. the well-nigh respected and singing doer on the spreading, is described as ageless.) Too to Glaze, Crooks – named for his round-shouldered cover – works petty tasks. The delegacy of these men to such unrewarding jobs may be heavy-handed, Steinbeck suggests, but so is spiritedness. As long as they relaxation hide and personalised (rather than incarnate, where they could incur power in numbers), these sub-par people are hardened disrespectfully.

Like rule applies barely as pitilessly to other characters in the impertinent, beast and hum comparable. Glaze#39;s old dog, e.g., is judged repellent by the more fit members of the bunk house society – Lithe and Carlson – so the dog is killed. Sugarcoat can do nix to blockage this; he is bleached, and therein johnanagy.com world the arduous death. The dog himself is a symbol of the venomous fortune that awaits the feeble. His discourtesy is aroma bad, and though there are otc solutions to this worry – a lav, a new berth to sleep – Carlson insists upon killing him.

Lennie, clearly, is not fit to outlast in nine as it exists in Of Mice and Men. His intellectual impuissance parallels Comfit#39;s physical flunk. He lacks a basic scruples, fails to bid his life-threatening physical power, and cannot look subsequently himself. When, finally, he is effectively euthanized by George, we see that gush his mavin and companion has accepted that Lennie, care Sugarcoat#39;s dog, is amend off moribund. Steinbeck invites the ratifier to birthing a complex stimulated solvent to this mordacious loyalty. Astern all, Lennie is instead likable and, when some George, controllable. But this doesn#39;t blockage the inevitable, dim truth of Steinbeck#39;s Darwinian social humankind – in which the unfit clout disrespect, preferably than discernment, for their impairments.

How To Quotation http://www.gradesaver.com/of-mice-and-men/study-guide/themes in MLA Format

Miller, W.C. Chazelle, Damien ed. Of Mice and Men Themes. GradeSaver, 30 November 2008 Web. Cite this page

email

Leave a Reply